0.09/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 05:32:36 EDT 2022 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.46 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.17/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # post_as_ho1 with pid 8396 completed with status 0 0.17/0.46 # Result found by post_as_ho1 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 65s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # post_as_ho4 with pid 8404 completed with status 0 0.17/0.46 # Result found by post_as_ho4 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 65s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # Proof found! 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Theorem 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_22, type, b: $i). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_23, type, cP: $i > $o). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_24, type, a: $i). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i). 0.17/0.46 thf(cBLEDSOE6, conjecture, ?[X1:$i > $o]:((((~((X1 @ b))&?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2)))&![X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X3)=>(cP @ X3))))<=((cP @ a)&((a)!=(b))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cBLEDSOE6)). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:$i > $o]:((((cP @ a)&((a)!=(b)))=>((~(X1 @ b)&?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2)))&![X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X3)=>(cP @ X3))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBLEDSOE6])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i > $o, X8:$i]:((((cP @ a)&((a)!=(b)))&(((X7 @ (esk1_1 @ X7))|((X7 @ b)|~(X7 @ X8)))&(~(cP @ (esk1_1 @ X7))|((X7 @ b)|~(X7 @ X8)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ b)|~((cP @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ b)|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((b)=(X2))|~((cP @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)=(X2))))))))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_3])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)=(X2)))))=(X2))|((b)=(X2)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_4])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((b)=(X2))|~((cP @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (cP @ a), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((a)!=(b)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9]), ['proof']). 0.17/0.46 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 4 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 7 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 18 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 18 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 1 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 37 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 18 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 1 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 4 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 13 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 10 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 20 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 5 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 18 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1422 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.002 s 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.001 s 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.003 s 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages 0.17/0.47 0.17/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.47 # User time : 0.003 s 0.17/0.47 # System time : 0.002 s 0.17/0.47 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.17/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages 0.17/0.47 EOF